Comparison
Recruit Flow vs Greenhouse
A plain comparison of two tools that solve overlapping problems. Greenhouse is enterprise ats — built for enterprise teams hiring 100+/year. Recruit Flow is built for small teams who want a clean pipeline without enterprise overhead.
| Feature | Greenhouse | Recruit Flow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $6k–$30k+/year, quote-based | $149/mo flat — everything included |
| Setup time | Hours to days | Under 5 minutes — import a CSV |
| Table + Kanban views | Usually one or the other | Both, same data |
| Candidate timeline | Often locked to higher tiers | Included |
| CSV import & export | Limited | First-class — paste, upload, map |
| Learning curve | Onboarding required | Looks like the spreadsheet you already use |
Pick Greenhouse if…
Large companies with dedicated recruiting ops.
- Deep compliance & EEOC reporting
- Structured interview kits
- Hundreds of integrations
Pick Recruit Flow if…
You're a small team that needs a clean pipeline, not an enterprise suite.
- If you hire under 30 people a year, Greenhouse is a tuxedo at a hardware store.
- Recruit Flow gives you the table, board, timeline, and CSV import — without the requisition workflows you'll never touch.
- Flat $149/mo. No quote calls. No 'starting at' fine print.
Where Greenhouse can fall short
- Overkill for small teams
- Long onboarding
- Quote-only pricing
Try Recruit Flow free
Import a CSV in 30 seconds. See if a calmer pipeline is what you've been missing. No credit card to start.
Start free