Comparison
Recruit Flow vs Workable
A plain comparison of two tools that solve overlapping problems. Workable is mid-market ats — built for mid-market hr teams. Recruit Flow is built for small teams who want a clean pipeline without enterprise overhead.
| Feature | Workable | Recruit Flow |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | From $169/mo per job slot | $149/mo flat — everything included |
| Setup time | Hours to days | Under 5 minutes — import a CSV |
| Table + Kanban views | Usually one or the other | Both, same data |
| Candidate timeline | Often locked to higher tiers | Included |
| CSV import & export | Limited | First-class — paste, upload, map |
| Learning curve | Onboarding required | Looks like the spreadsheet you already use |
Pick Workable if…
Companies running 5+ open roles with HR-led hiring.
- Job-board syndication
- Sourcing tools
- Careers-page builder
Pick Recruit Flow if…
You're a small team that needs a clean pipeline, not an enterprise suite.
- Workable charges per active job. Recruit Flow is one flat price, unlimited roles.
- If you already have a careers page and sourcing channels, you're paying for things you don't use.
Where Workable can fall short
- Per-job pricing adds up
- Feature bloat for small teams
- Slow UI
Try Recruit Flow free
Import a CSV in 30 seconds. See if a calmer pipeline is what you've been missing. No credit card to start.
Start free